An over-the-counter, off-patent, heavily advertised, cure-all drug taken in excess can produce symptoms of "influenza", what about the excess mortality?
I'm a bit late! Your graph is very interesting deaths/mill population in NY Citiy 1918 vs 2020 pandemic peaks. Allopathic medicine / "Public Health" took a lot out a lot more in 2020 than they "achieved" in 1918.
"fraudulent" from the point of view the "official" COVID-19 data is incorrect in the graph or "fraudulent" from the point of view the deaths were assigned to "COVID-19" but in actual fact the decedent was "taken out" by all manner of means from "protocols" to simply "assumed" to have died of "COVID-19". I'm sure you mean the latter but want to confirm...after all they are your graphs.
Do you have an article written specific to this graph that I can also link to at ToE?
The problem with this thesis is that when Mathew Crawford looked into the Spanish flu by studying individual countries registered deaths, he couldn’t find any excess deaths at all.
I’ve read about aspirin’s role in the deaths of soldiers then. Thank you for diving in & sharing this critical information!
Ditto!
Great insights. Have passed along to in-laws, one of whom takes large doses of NSAIDs. Also will share in my Substack.
Another good article that discusses NSAIDS is by Midwestern Doctor, here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/i/138148855/nsaids
Related data https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1704262412751278195?s=20
I'm a bit late! Your graph is very interesting deaths/mill population in NY Citiy 1918 vs 2020 pandemic peaks. Allopathic medicine / "Public Health" took a lot out a lot more in 2020 than they "achieved" in 1918.
Added you in
https://totalityofevidence.com/1918-influenza-pandemic-spanish-flu/
I suspect the 2020 curve is fraudulent
"fraudulent" from the point of view the "official" COVID-19 data is incorrect in the graph or "fraudulent" from the point of view the deaths were assigned to "COVID-19" but in actual fact the decedent was "taken out" by all manner of means from "protocols" to simply "assumed" to have died of "COVID-19". I'm sure you mean the latter but want to confirm...after all they are your graphs.
Do you have an article written specific to this graph that I can also link to at ToE?
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-f-word
Article above is my definition of fraudulent; I don't have an article related to the 2020 v 1918 deaths.
I have shown it in presentations, e.g., the one linked here https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1777186713699283153
Thanks...I'll add that to my watch list
IVM quack nostrum? https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/ivermectin 🙏🏽
The problem with this thesis is that when Mathew Crawford looked into the Spanish flu by studying individual countries registered deaths, he couldn’t find any excess deaths at all.
So no pandemic occurred, does that sound familiar
Do you hav link tò Mathews stack on this?...he has so many.
No not exactly, he said it one of his conversations.
I’ll have a look when I get the time
Everyone interested into diving much deeper
protonmagic.substack.com
dpl003.substack.com
The truth is just incredible, which is why THE SYNAGOGUE OF LIES/MAKE BELIEVE is so big and popular, all over the world!