FDA's Prescription Drug User Fee for Applications requiring Clinical Data
Since 1992 the FDA fees have gone up, and doubled from $2M in 2017 to $4M for 2024
This data is for simply for those researching the FDA and Big Pharma….I needed to place this research data somewhere!
We know that our regulators make their money from Big Pharma fees. The FDA has been increasing their fees up every year since the 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) was passed.
But what are the other reprocussions of these exporbitant fees? How can a small company or a product that can’t be patented, like Vitamin C, be able to afford FDA’'s fees if a clinical trial was necessary- as seems to be demanded by the Evidence Based Medicine crowd.
Today I went through the archives and documented the fee which have been charged by the FDA for applications that required clinical data and ploted this.
You will notice that the fees have doubled from 2017 ~$2 million to 2024 ~$4 million! Why did they drop in 20171…I’ve not looked into, but it was a significant drop.
Graph of the fee’s that a drug (or vaccine) manufacturer is required to pay to the FDA for a product that requires clinical data assessment.
There are additional fees for non-clinical data. This is a snapshot of just one fee, and revenue stream for the FDA.
I couldn’t find the data for 2002, but did note this following information which likely affected the fee (which I don’t have time to dig into further.)
“Recognizing the necessity of reauthorizing PDUFA before the end of FY 2002 to assure continuity of operations, Congress enacted the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, which includes the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2002 (PDUFA III) reauthorizing user fees through FY 2007. The President signed PDUFA III into law on June 12, 2002”2
It would appear that every 5 years a "reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) is granted by the President which is intended to provide the “FDA with the necessary resources to maintain a predictable and efficient review process for human drug and biologic products.”3
These reauthorisations allow the FDA to increase their fees. Following the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 (PDUFA) the first extension appears to have been granted in 1998.4
From 1992-1997 “the agency reduced, by about 40%, the length of time it required to review new drug and biologic license applications, without compromising review soundness and quality”5
PDUFA VII Information Technology and Bioinformatics Goals and Progress
Wow, so I went looking for the current PDUFA (its VII) …and it appears they are rolling “technology” and “modernization” into the fees!
So if the FDA are going to “Leverage Cloud Technology to Progress Regulatory Digital Transformation” and “Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) for Drug Development and Review” - wouldn’t technology theoretically make assessment cheaper? Or does it just cut out those companies that cannot meet the new demands of the FDA?
Does this action help the FDA work with the United Nations to integrate drug regulation into a one-world regulation scheme?
Is there a Plan for a Global Regulator??
Several years back I came across the World Health Organisation’s Access 2030 program (started in 2016, possibly as early as 2014), and to me it appears to be a plan to roll all drug regulation into one global body - sold as the need to help 3rd world countries. It certainly appears they are working their way towards this with the collaboration set up between Australia-Singapore-Swiss-Canada-UK with their Accesss Consortium 6 (interesting name!).
Be on the lookout for Access 2030!
Helping you do your own research!
Support Jack’s Work
If you find the content at Totality of Evidence useful for yourself or to help awaken your family and friends, please consider becoming a paid subscriber so I can continue to add to this historical record.
From time to time I’ll add a stack here, but most of my work is done on the website, your support here, supports my work there!
Otherwise share the website on social media and subscribe to my substack so you get my next stack in your inbox!
https://web.archive.org/web/20170629010406/https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/default.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20061020030343/http://www.fda.gov/oc/PDUFA/default.ht
https://www.fda.gov/industry/prescription-drug-user-fee-amendments/pdufa-vi-fiscal-years-2018-2022
https://web.archive.org/web/20061009113054/http://www.fda.gov/oc/PDUFA/5yrplan.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20060622024952if_/http://www.fda.gov:80/oc/pdufa2/5yrplan/pdufa2.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20201101023413/https://www.tga.gov.au/australia-canada-singapore-switzerland-united-kingdom-access-consortium
"Hey, FDA, we want to slaughter as many Americans as possible, and we want to get away with calling the injection safe."
FDA: "No problem. Give us a bunch of money and we'll back your drugs, lie to America, and make sure nobody gets in trouble - because we've approved of what you're doing."
Thank you for your research and joining the dots. It does seem that a global brain is the aim. Well, at least there is a lot of global co-operation going on including the Moonshot project based in Japan which aims to have a quantum computer by 2050. One of their diagrams shows they are trying to mimic fungi energy saving techniques. They truly think they can act like God and integrate us with nature but all under their rules and using the IT that they control.
https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/program/goal6/index.html